Call for Papers - Ongoing round of submission, notification and publication.
    
  
Home    |    Login or Register    |    Contact CSC
By Title/Keywords/Abstract   By Author
Browse CSC-OpenAccess Library.
  • HOME
  • LIST OF JOURNALS
  • AUTHORS
  • EDITORS & REVIEWERS
  • LIBRARIANS & BOOK SELLERS
  • PARTNERSHIP & COLLABORATION
Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available
(no registration required)

(362.99KB)


-- CSC-OpenAccess Policy
-- Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License
>> COMPLETE LIST OF JOURNALS

EXPLORE PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES

EUROPE
MIDDLE EAST
ASIA
AFRICA
.............................
United States of America
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
Italy
France
Brazil
Germany
Malaysia
Turkey
China
Taiwan
Japan
Saudi Arabia
Jordan
Egypt
United Arab Emirates
India
Nigeria
USEFul: A Framework to Mainstream Web Site Usability through Automated Evaluation
Justin Mifsud, Alexiei Dingli
Pages - 10 - 30     |    Revised - 31-03-2011     |    Published - 04-04-2011
Published in International Journal of Recent Trends in Human Computer Interaction (IJHCI)
Volume - 2   Issue - 1    |    Publication Date - March / April 2011  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
References   |   Cited By (8)   |   Abstracting & Indexing
KEYWORDS
Usability, Automated Usability Evaluation, Usability Guidelines, Usability Problems
ABSTRACT
A paradox has been observed whereby web site usability is proven to be an essential element in a web site, yet at the same time there exist an abundance of web pages with poor usability. This discrepancy is the result of limitations that are currently preventing web developers in the commercial sector from producing usable web sites. In this paper we propose a framework whose objective is to alleviate this problem by automating certain aspects of the usability evaluation process. Mainstreaming comes as a result of automation, therefore enabling a non-expert in the field of usability to conduct the evaluation. This results in reducing the costs associated with such evaluation. Additionally, the framework allows the flexibility of adding, modifying or deleting guidelines without altering the code that references them since the guidelines and the code are two separate components. A comparison of the evaluation results carried out using the framework against published evaluations of web sites carried out by web site usability professionals reveals that the framework is able to automatically identify the majority of usability violations. Due to the consistency with which it evaluates, it identified additional guideline-related violations that were not identified by the human evaluators.
CITED BY (8)  
1 Guran, A. M., & Cojocar, G. S. O propunere de arhitecturǎ pentru evaluarea metricilor de execuţie folosind AOP.
2 Miehling, M. J. (2014). Correlation of affiliate performance against web evaluation metrics (Doctoral dissertation, Edinburgh Napier University).
3 Zahran, D. I., Al-Nuaim, H. A., Rutter, M. J., & Benyon, D. (2014). A comparative approach to web evaluation and website evaluation methods. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 10(1).
4 Nyström, N., Kann, L., Pelz-Wall, T., & Bälter, O. (2014). Online user tracking and usability tools-a mapping study.
5 Beri, B., & Singh, P. (2013). Web Analytics: Increasing Website’s Usability and Conversion Rate. International Journal of Computer Applications, 72(6), 35-38.
6 Mäesalu, H. (2013). Automated Rule-Based Selection and Instantiation of Layout Templates for Widget-Based Microsites (Doctoral dissertation, MSc thesis, Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia).
7 Dunlea, A. L. (2013). Evaluating Usability Evaluations.
8 Mäesalu, H. (2013). Automaatne reeglitel põhinev veebilehe struktuurimallide valimine ja rakendamine (Doctoral dissertation, Tartu Ülikool).
ABSTRACTING & INDEXING
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 refSeek 
4 Scribd 
5 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
REFERENCES
Cabinet Office. (2007) Available at http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/egovernment/ resources/quality-framework.asp [Accessed 9 October 2010]
EH. Chi, A. Rosien, G. Supattanasiri, A. Williams, C. Royer, C. Chow, et al. “The Bloodhound project: automating discovery of web usability issues using the InfoScent™ simulator” In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 03 Conf.. pp. 505-512. Ft.Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2003
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work in European Union Council Directives. (1990) Available at: http://eurlex. europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1990L0270:20070627:EN:HTML [Accessed 9 October 2010]
G. Brajnik. “Automatic web usability evaluation: what needs to be done?”. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Austin Texas, USA, 2000
International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) DIS 9242-11, (1998) Available at: http://www.iso.org
J. Nielsen. “User interface directions for the web” Communications of the ACM. 1999, pp.65-
M. Swaak, M. De Jong, P. De Vries. “Effects of Information usefulness, visual attractiveness, and usability on web visitors’ trust and behavioural intentions.” In IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. P. 1-5. Waikiki, HI, USA, 2009
P. Paolini. “Hypermedia, the web and usability issues” In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems. pp. 9-11 IEEE, 1999
P. Vora. “Designing for the web: a survey”. Interactions. pp. 13-30 (1998)
T. Comber. “Building usable web pages: an HCI perspective”. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on the Web AusWeb'95. pp. 119-124. Ballina, Australia, 1995
MANUSCRIPT AUTHORS
Mr. Justin Mifsud
Goldsmiths University of London - Malta
Dr. Alexiei Dingli
University of Malta - Malta
alexiei.dingli@um.edu.mt


CREATE AUTHOR ACCOUNT
 
LAUNCH YOUR SPECIAL ISSUE
View all special issues >>
 
PUBLICATION VIDEOS
 
You can contact us anytime since we have 24 x 7 support.
Join Us|List of Journals|
    
Copyrights © 2025 Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals). All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Conditions