Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Boards Contributing to the Protection of the Environment: Looking at the Dynamics between In-groups and Out-groups
Sara De Masi
Pages - 76 - 88     |    Revised - 31-03-2021     |    Published - 30-04-2021
Volume - 12   Issue - 2    |    Publication Date - April 2021  Table of Contents
Corporate Governance, Environmental Protection, Board Dynamics, Women on Boards.
The inconclusiveness of previous research on the relationship between women on boards and pro-environmental initiatives calls for a reassessment of this association. Following the social identity theory, this study examines the influence of women on boards on the corporate decisions related to the emissions reduction, by distinguishing between women as out-group members and men as in-group members. Using an econometric model that employs a sample of FTSE-MIB companies over the years 2009-2018, the findings show that the ability of the board to use the women’s contribution changes according to the dynamics between out-group and in-group. Specifically, when the board has only one women director, the in-group members (men) fail to consider in their decisions the woman’s perspectives and her sensitivity toward the environmental consequences of the business activities. These dynamics influence the board’s attention towards the protection of the environment. When the out-group reaches a considerable size (three women) the dynamics between in-group and out-group change and the board becomes more engaged in environmental issues. The results also find that there is a turning point, after which the board engagement towards a better protection of the environment does not increase with the number of women directors, showing an inverted U-shaped relationship.
1 EconPapers 
2 refSeek 
4 Google Scholar 
5 J-Gate 
6 Scribd 
7 Index Copernicus International (ICI) 
8 SlideShare 
Ahmad, N., Li, H., Tian, X., “Increased firm profitability under a nationwide environmental information disclosure program? Evidence from China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 230, pp. 1176-1187, 2019.
Alhaj, N. “The impact of corporate governance on improving overall performance of the companies”, International Journal of Business Research and Management, 10(2), pp. 13-28, 2019.
Asch, S. E. “Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of Judgement”, in H. Guetzkow (ed.). Groups, leadership and men. Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 177– 190. 1951.
Atif, M., Alam, M. S., Hossain, M. “Firm sustainable investment: Are female directors greener?”, Business Strategy & Environment, vol. 29, pp. 3449– 3469, 2020.
Bear, S., Rahman, N. Post, C. “ The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation”, Journal of Business Ethics vol. 97, pp. 207–221, 2010.
Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M., McIlkenny, P. “Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 142, pp. 369–382, 2017.
Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., Savioli, M. “The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 26, pp. 1485–1499, 2019.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Kang, S. K., Peery, D. (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. T. Fiske, & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), SAGE handbook of social cognition (pp. 311-329). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Borsa Italiana https://www.borsaitaliana.it/borsa/indici/indici-in- continua/dettaglio.html?indexCode=FTSEMIB&lang=en
Chams, N., arc a-Blandon, J., “Sustainable or not sustainable? The role of the board of directors”, Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 226, pp. 1067-1081, 2019.
De Masi, S, Slomka- olebiowska, A, Becagli, C, Paci, A. “Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure”, Business Strategy & Environment, pp. 1– 14, 2021.
De Masi, S. Slomka- olebiowska, A., Paci, A. “Women on boards and monitoring tasks: An empirical application of Kanter's theory”. Management Decision, forthcoming, 2021.
Effiok, S., Effiong, J. “The implication of corporate governance on financial institution’s performance in Nigeria”, International Journal of Business Research and Management, 3(5), pp. 205 – 219, 2012.
Elsayih, J., Tang, Q. and Lan, Y.-C. “Corporate governance and carbon transparency: Australian experience”, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 405-422, 2018.
Fuente, J.A., García-Sánchez, I.M., Lozano, M.B. “The role of the board of directors in the adoption of GRI guidelines for the disclosure of CSR information”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 141, pp. 737-750, 2017.
Galbreath J. “Is Board Gender Diversity Linked to Financial Performance? The Mediating Mechanism of CSR”, Business & Society. 57(5), pp. 863-889, 2018.
Galbreath, J. “Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors”, Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 17(1), pp. 17– 38, 2011.
Glass, C., Cook, A., Ingersoll, A. R. “ Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance”, Business Strategy & Environment, vol. 25(7), pp. 495–511, 2016.
Halliday, C. S., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Fainshmidt, S. “ Women on boards of directors: a meta-analytic examination of the roles of organizational leadership and national context for gender equality”, Journal of Business and Psycology, vol. 36, pp. 173-191, 2021.
Haque, F. “The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms”, The British Accounting Review, vol. 49, pp. 347-364, 2017.
Haque, F., Jones, M. J. “European firms’ corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016”, The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), 2020.
Hewstone, M. “ The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), pp. 311-335., 1990.
Hogg, M. A. “A social identity theory of leadership”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), pp. 184-200, 2001.
Hollindale, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., Chapple, L. “Women on boards and greenhouse gas emission disclosures”, Accounting and Finance, vol. 59, pp. 277–308, 2019.
Huse, M., Solberg, A. G. “Gender related boardroom dynamics: How women make and can make contributions on corporate boards”, Women in Management Review, vol. 21 , pp. 113– 130, 2006.
Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J., Tomic, I. M. “Managers' attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences?” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 90(3), pp. 343–353, 2009.
Joecks, J., Pull, K., Vetter, K.. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?” Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), pp. 61–72, 2013.
Kamran H., Ali F., Shehryar M., Natarajan B. “Fostering a diversity culture in business: Npower and the recruitment of ethnic minorities”, International Journal of Business Research and Management, 7(2) pp. 15-30, 2016.
Kamran, H., Khurshid I., Ali, F., Srivastava, N. “Value creation through corporate social responsibility in developing countries: A case study of Proctor & amble Pakistan”, International Journal of Business Research and Management, 3(6), pp. 279 - 293, 2012.
Kanadli, S. ., Torchia, M., abaldon, P. “Increasing women's contribution on board decision making: The importance of chairperson leadership efficacy and board openness”, European Management Journal, vol. 36, n. 1, pp. 91-104, 2018.
Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., Erkut, S. “Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards”. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), pp. 145–164, 2008.
Liao, L., Luo, L., Tang, Q. “ Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure”, The British Accounting Review, vol. 47(4), pp. 409–424, 2015.
Lin, C., Chiu, S., “The impact of shared values, corporate cultural characteristics, and implementing corporate social responsibility on innovative behavior”, International Journal of Business Research and Management, 8(2), pp. 31-50, 2017.
Lu, J., Herremans, I. M. “ Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective”, Business Strategy & Environment, vol. 28, pp. 1449– 1464, 2019.
Madsen, H. L., Ulhøi, J. P., “Sustainable visioning: Re-framing strategic vision to enable a sustainable corporate transformation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 288, pp. 125602, 2021.
Mallin, C., Michelon, G., Raggi, D. “Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: how does governance affect social and environmental disclosure?”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 114, pp. 29-43, 2013.
Matsa, D.A., Miller, A.R., “ A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 5, pp. 136-169, 2013,
Naciti, V. “Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 237, pp. 117727, 2019.
Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A.A. Iqbal, U. “Are women eco-friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation”, Business Strategy & Environment, pp. 1–16, 2020.
Nielsen, S., Huse, M. “The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface” Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 18, pp. 136-148, 2010.
Post, C., Byron, K., “Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 58, pp. 1546–1571, 2015.
Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. Garcia-Sanchez, I. “The Role of the Board of Directors in Disseminating Relevant Information on Greenhouse Gases”, Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(3), pp. 391-424, 2010.
Rao, K., Tilt, C. “Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making”. Journal of Business Ethics 138, pp. 327– 347, 2016.
Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. “Corporate governance and codes of ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 90, pp. 187, 2009
Rose, C. “Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence”, Corporate overnance: An International Review, 15, pp. 404–413, 2007.
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G. (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7–24. Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL.
Tingbani, I, Chithambo, L, Tauringana, V, Papanikolaou, N. “ Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures”, Business Strategy & Environment, 29, pp. 2194– 2210, 2020.
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., Huse, M. “ Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass”, Journal of Business Ethics, 102, pp. 299–317, 2011.
Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., Lueg, R. “Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120063, 2020.
Webb, E. “An examination of socially responsible firms' board structure”, Journal of Management and Governance, vol. 8(3), pp. 255-277, 2004.
Westphal, J. D., Milton, L. P. “How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45(2), pp. 366–398, 2000.
Widyawati, L. “A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics”, Business Strategy & Environment. vol. 29, pp. 619– 637, 2020.
Zaid, M. A., Wang, M., Adib, M., Sahyouni, A., Abuhijleh, S. T. “Boardroom nationality and gender diversity: Implications for corporate sustainability performance”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 251, pp.119652, 2020.
Zattoni, A. “Corporate governance: How to design good companies”, Bocconi University Press. Milano. 2020.
Dr. Sara De Masi
Department of Economics and Management, University of Florence, Via delle Pandette 9, 50127 Florence - Italy