Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
How does Optimism impact on Entrepreneurs’ Overconfidence?
Sergio Margarita, Luisa Tibiletti, Mariacristina Uberti
Pages - 45 - 53     |    Revised - 31-08-2015     |    Published - 30-09-2015
Volume - 6   Issue - 3    |    Publication Date - September / October 2015  Table of Contents
Optimism and Overconfidence, Benchmarking Procedure, Escalation and Deescalation of Commitment, Regulatory Focus Theory, Strategic Key Performance Indicators.
Optimism and overconfidence are well documented cognitive biases in the entrepreneurship literature (see Shepherd et al., 2015). Although these sentiments are typically thought to be almost overlapped, empirical studies make evidence of their different construct (see Trevelyan, 2008, 2011). In the paper at hand we investigate the descriptive and normative motivations inducing misconfidence biases to arise. First, we introduce the definition of optimism as underestimation of the task difficulty to meet a strategic Key Performance Indicator (KPI). Second, we define overconfidence as the tendency to overestimate the probability to achieve an uncertain task. To calculate this probability we set up a prescriptive benchmarking-based model. Third, we spotlight situations in enterprise risk management (ERM) where misconfidence biases in judgment emerge. Complementing Bordley et al. (2015) and Tibiletti and Uberti (2015) results, we show that overconfidence arises in presence of two extreme circumstances: (1) underestimation of task difficulty coupled with extremely poor entrepreneurial projects, and (2) overestimation of task difficulty coupled with extremely good entrepreneurial projects. Our theoretical findings match with accounted biased behaviors recognized among entrepreneurs known as the escalation and de-escalation of commitment effect biases. The study is based on the normative foundation for overconfidence set up by Bordley et al. (2015) and casts light on which circumstances that occurs. Our results have also practical implications. In fact, it is important for entrepreneurs be aware of situations where self-confidence is normatively biased.
CITED BY (1)  
1 Rezaei, M., & Abtahi, F. (2020). Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Capital and Self-Employment Intention of Agricultural Students at University of Arak. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 16(2), 63-76.
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 refSeek 
4 Scribd 
5 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
A.O.I. Hoffmann, S.F. Henry and N. Kalogeras. “Aspirations as Reference Points: An Experimental Investigation of Risk Behavior over Time.” Theory and Decision, vol. 75, 193210, 2013.
B.M. Staw. “Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 2744, 1976.
C. Heath, R. Larrick and G. Wu. “Goals as Reference Points.” Cognitive Psychology, 38, pp. 79-109, 1999.
C.R. Everett and R.J. Fairchild. “A Theory of Entrepreneurial Overconfidence, Effort, and Firm Outcomes.” The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2015.
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. “Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures.” Technical rept. 1042-77-6, Decisions And Designs Inc Mclean Va., 1977.
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk.” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263-91, 1979.
D.A. Moore and P.J. Healy. ”The Trouble with Overconfidence.” Psychological Review, vol. 115, No. 2, pp. 502-517, 2008.
D.A. Shepherd, T.A. Williams and H. Patzelt. “Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and Research agenda.” Journal of Management, Published online July 14, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0149206314541153.
E. Castagnoli and M. LiCalzi. “Expected Utility without Utility.” Theory and Decision, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 281-301, 1996.
E.T. Higgins, R.S. Friedman, R.E. Harlow, L.C. Idson, O.N. Ayduk and A. Taylor. “Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride.” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 3-23, 2001.
E.T. Higgins. “Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle.” in Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.30, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1998, pp.1-46.
Engelen, C. Neumann and C. Schwens. ““Of Course I Can”: The Effect of CEO Overconfidence on Entrepreneurially Oriented Firms.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12099.
F. Beccacece and A. Cillo. “Applying the Benchmarking Procedure: A Decision Criterion of Choice Under Risk?”, Theory and Decision, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 75-91, 2006.
F. Giardini, G. Coricelli, M. Joffily and A. Sirigu. “Overconfidence in Predictions as an Effect of Desirability Bias.” In M. Abdellaoui and J.D. Hey (Eds.), Advances in Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty, Theory and Decision Library C., vol. 42, 2008, pp. 163-180. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
F. Modigliani and M. Miller. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review , Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 261-297, 1958.
Galasso and T. Simcoe. “CEO overcon?dence and innovation.” Management Science, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1469-1484, 2011.
J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. “Theory of games and economic behavior.” Princenton University Press, Princeton, Second Edition, 1947.
J.F. Yates. “Judgment and decision making.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1990.
J.S. Lee, M. Keil and K.F.E. Wong. “Effect of Goal Difficulty on Escalation of Commitment.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2014 DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1835.
K. Borch. “Decision rules depending on the probability of ruin.” Oxford Economic Papers, 20, pp. 1-10, 1968.
K.M. Abadir. “The Mean-Median-Mode Inequality: Counterexamples.” Econometric Theory, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 477-482, 2005.
K.M. Hmieleski and R.A. Baron. “Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 473-488, 2009.
L. Tibiletti and M. Uberti. “Optimism and Overconfidence Biases among Entrepreneurs: a benchmarking-model.” Proceedings of 4th European Business Research Conference 9-10 April 2015, Imperial College, London, UK, 2015 ISBN: 978-1-922069-72-6.
L.J. Savage. “The foundations of statistics.” New York: Wiley, 1954.
M.F. Scheier, C.S. Carver and M.W. Bridges. “Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 6, p. 1063, 1994.
M.H. Berhold. “The use of distribution functions to represent utility functions.” Management Science, vol. 19, pp. 825-829, 1979.
R. Bordley and M. LiCalzi. “Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions.” Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer-Verlag 23, pp. 53-74, 2000.
R. Bordley, M. LiCalzi and L. Tibiletti. “A target-based foundation for the “hard-easy effect” bias.” 17th Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES) Conference, Venice, Italy, October 15-17, 2015. Available http://virgo.unive.it/wpideas/storage/2014wp23.pdf.
R. Trevelyan. “Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity.” Management Decision, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 986-1001, 2008.
R. Trevelyan. “Self-regulation and effort in entrepreneurial tasks.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 17, pp. 39-63, 2011. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552551111107507.
R.A. Brealy, S.C. Myers and F. Allen. “Principles of Corporate Finance.” McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York, 2006. ISBN 0-07-295723-9.
S. Lichtenstein and B. Fischhoff. “Do those who know more also know more about ow much they know?.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 20, pp. 159-183, 1977.
S. Lichtenstein, B. Fischhoff and L.D. Phillips. “Calibration of subjective probabilities: The state of the art up to 1980.” In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
T.E. Conine. “Estimating the Probability of Meeting Financial Commitments: A Behavioral Finance Perspective Based on Business Simulations.” Global Business and Organizational Excellence, Vol. 33, pp. 6-13, 2014.
W.R. Zwet. “Mean, median, mode II.” Statistica Neerlandica, vol. 33, pp. 1-5, 1979.
Associate Professor Sergio Margarita
University of Torino, Italy - Italy
Associate Professor Luisa Tibiletti
Department Management, University of Torino, Italy - Italy
Associate Professor Mariacristina Uberti
University of Torino, Italy - Italy

View all special issues >>